Claude for law firms, without privilege risk or sanctioned citations.
Most firms have associates and partners using Claude already, without policy, without training, and often on personal accounts. We replace that with a governed deployment: hardened workflows for drafting and review, an AI usage policy that survives a malpractice review, and audit-ready documentation your General Counsel can put in front of clients. Built around your DMS, conflicts system, and the way your firm actually practices.
Why this is hard right now
Legal AI adoption sits on a different risk profile than almost any other industry. The same tool that drafts an engagement letter in ninety seconds can, in the wrong workflow, paste privileged material into a consumer chat product, hallucinate a citation that ends up in a filed brief, or produce work product a client can later argue was never the firm's. Each of those is already a published failure mode. None are exotic.
The pressure cuts the other direction too. Clients are running AI inside their own legal departments and asking why outside counsel is not. Newer associates expect it. Practice management vendors are bolting AI features into the DMS faster than firms can write policy around them. The question is no longer whether Claude is in the firm. It is whether the firm can describe how, where, by whom, and under what controls.
Our work is to bring that picture into focus and ship the deployment that goes with it. Workflows where the speed gains are real and measurable, governance that holds up in a malpractice review, and a documented handoff so the firm runs independently after we leave.
What we do for law firms
Four engagements that match how legal work actually flows. Scoped, fixed-fee, with a documented handoff.
Workflow Integration
Embed Claude into intake, drafting, and matter review so engagement letters, standard motions, and routine memos move from input to first draft in a fraction of the time, with the firm's voice preserved.
See the engagementAI Security & Governance
Privilege-aware AI usage policy, vendor risk file, and partner-ratified controls. Audit-ready documentation that holds up in front of malpractice carriers, clients, and bar counsel.
See the engagementCustom Web Apps & SaaS
Internal tools that go beyond what a prompt can do. Matter dashboards, conflict-aware research assistants, and document-assembly engines wired into your DMS.
See the engagementPrompting & Projects
Production-grade Claude Projects for litigation, transactional, and regulatory practice groups. Reliable outputs at scale, with prompt libraries documented and owned by the firm.
See the engagementReal outcomes from legal engagements
Representative work with U.S. law firms. Names anonymized; outcomes verified.
70%
reduction in legal document drafting time
Legal Workflow Automation
A 210-attorney law firm cut drafting time on routine legal documents by 70% after we embedded Claude into their workflow. Client intake forms, engagement letters, and standard motions now move from inputs to first draft in a fraction of the time, with the firm's voice and formatting preserved throughout.
Legal15+ hrs
saved per professional per week on review
Document Review Intelligence
Senior associates and partners gave back 15+ hours per week per attorney once a Claude-powered review layer was embedded into their existing matter management. The model surfaces material clauses, flags inconsistencies across drafts, and recommends next steps. Reviewers still sign off, but they spend their time on judgment, not on first-pass reading.
LegalQuestions law firm leadership asks
Drawn from actual partner, GC, and risk-committee conversations.
Get Claude into your practice without the risk.
Book a 30-minute discovery call. We will walk through where your firm is today, what your malpractice carrier and clients will ask for, and which workflows are worth governing first. You will leave with a clear next step, whether or not we end up working together.
Book a discovery call